There is a subtext to the excoriation of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin which many folks don’t see. Yes, she’s being attacked because she’s a woman; but WHY have the Democrats and the left-wing media, along with a few others, mounted such a vicious, concerted attack on Palin? The answer is that McCain and Palin have violated the rules of the Establishment elite and they are considered a clear and present danger to that group’s dominance of American politics and government.
So who do I mean when I refer to the “Establishment elite?” It is not some dark-of-the-night “conspiracy,” but a group of persons who consider themselves to be, to use John F. Kennedy’s term, “the best and the brightest.” They are the flip side of the concept of “entitlement” – - they believe that they are entitled to govern. The core of this group consists of graduates of the Ivy League universities – - Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Harvard, Penn, Princeton and Yale – - although a few others are allowed in the “club,” for example, Northwestern and Stanford.
Since the end of World War II, the influence of the Establishment elite has grown. This influence is starkly apparent when you consider the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. The nine sitting justices come from only four law schools: three Ivies – - Harvard (5), Yale (2), and Columbia (1) – - plus an acceptable alternative, Northwestern (1). Here are their educational backgrounds:
John G. Roberts, Jr. – - A.B. from Harvard College, J.D. from Harvard Law School; John Paul Stevens – - A.B. from the University of Chicago, J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law; Antonin Scalia – - A.B. from Georgetown University and the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, LL.B. from Harvard Law School; Anthony M. Kennedy – - B.A. from Stanford University and the London School of Economics, LL.B. from Harvard Law School; David H. Souter – - A.B. from Harvard College, A.B. and M.A. in Jurisprudence from Oxford University; LL.B. from Harvard Law School; Clarence Thomas – - A.B. from Holy Cross College, J.D. from Yale Law School; Ruth Bader Ginsburg – - B.A. from Cornell University, attended Harvard Law School, LL.B. from Columbia Law School; Stephen G. Breyer – - A.B. from Stanford University, B.A. from Magdalen College, Oxford, LL.B. from Harvard Law School; Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr. – - undergraduate degree from Princeton University and J. D. from Yale Law School.
When Harriet Miers was nominated for the high court, a friend asked me what I thought of her chances of confirmation. “Not a snowball’s chance in Hell,” I responded. Why? “She got her law degree from Southern Methodist University.” The attack on Miers was typical of the reaction of Establishment Elite types – - she was scorned as “unqualified,” in her case because she had not previously been a judge (a consideration which would have eliminated Louis Brandeis, one of the finest minds in the history of the Court). The “unqualified” attack is exactly the same strategy being used against Sarah Palin, and the calls for Palin’s withdrawal echo the same verbiage used, with unfortunate success, against Miers, who was perfectly well qualified for the Supreme Court – - more so, I dare say, than some of the EE types who sit on that bench.
I have been around long enough to remember the rejection of Mildred Lillie, who Pres. Richard Nixon intended to nominate in 1971 to be the first woman to sit on the Supreme Court. A fellow jurist wrote of Mildred Lillie, “During her 55 years as a judicial officer she made a stunning contribution to our justice system. . . Chief Justice George hailed her as a great jurist and scholar.” However, in 1971 the practice of law was a male-dominated institution and prospective Federal judges were “rated” by a committee of the American Bar Association. Nixon withdrew Lillie from consideration after the American Bar Association committee rated her “unqualified.” Sound familiar? At the time it was thought that the rating was based on “the panel’s discomfort with the notion of a woman on the high court;” the official reason given was that Mildred Lillie was only a state court judge and didn’t have experience on the Federal bench (a consideration which would have eliminated Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., another of the finest minds in the history of the Court).
If you think that the current composition of the Court is atypical, consider some of the other recent Justices: Byron White – - Yale Law School; Potter Stewart – - Yale Law School; William J. Brennan, Jr. – - Harvard Law School; John M. Harlan II – - undergraduate, Princeton University; law, Harvard Law School; Earl Warren – - undergrad and law, University of California at Berkeley; Sherman Minton – - law degrees: Indiana University School of Law and Yale Law School. A law degree actually is not a requirement for sitting on the Supreme Court, and as recently the 1940s and early 1950s, a Chief Justice, Frederick M. Vinson, had not graduated from law school.
Now, here are the educational backgrounds of those whose nominations have been rejected or withdrawn in recent years: Harriet Miers – - B.A. and law degrees from Southern Methodist University; Robert Bork – - University of Chicago Law School; Douglas Ginsburg – - University of Chicago Law School; Harrold Carswell – - Walter F. George School of Law of Mercer University; Clement Haynesworth – - Harvard Law School. Only one “Ivy” of the 5.
Maintaining control of the Supreme Court is, of course, much easier than maintaining control over positions where a vote of the governed makes the decision. Nonetheless, the EE often successfully supports its own – - for example, George W. Bush (Yale University, Harvard Business School) over John McCain (U. S. Naval Academy) for the 2000 Republican Presidential nomination.
Several years ago, I attended the graduation of a family friend from an Ivy League university. The President of the University told the graduates, among other things: “You are part of a privileged elite.” Plain enough?
The Establishment Elite accepts women like Hillary Clinton (Yale Law School) but not a woman like Sarah Palin (University of Idaho). Barack Obama (B.A. Columbia; J.D., Harvard Law School) is, of course, in the Club. So make no mistake about it: The EE is fighting Sarah Palin, and will fight her to the bitter end, because she represents their worst nightmare – - a competent, strong-willed, politically-astute woman who does not belong to or go along with the Club.
Oh, one more thing – - Google up the reactions of this sample of media people to Sarah Palin: Keith Olbermann (MSNBC) – Cornell University; Joe Klein (Time) – U. Pennsylvania; Harold Meyerson (American Prospect) – Columbia; Ruth Marcus (Washington Post) – Yale, Harvard Law; Marc Penn (pollster/Politico) – Harvard; Peter Scobic (New Republic) – Brown U.; Eve Fairbanks – (New Republic) Yale; Michael Crowley (New Republic) Yale; Nicholas Kristof (NY Times) – Harvard; Michael Kinsley (Slate) – Harvard; E. J. Dionne – (Washington Post) – Harvard; Jonathan Alter (Newsweek) – Harvard. If you have read this far, you should not be surprised at what you find – - horrified, yes; surprised, no.
Special thanks to Glen Schorzman, a kindred spirit whom I have never met, who posted this comment on the Wall Street Journal site today:
“The real problem the elite media has with Gov. Palin is that she is not a product of the Ivy League or its eastern liberal arts college cousins. How can someone that hasn’t read the same 50 books, and studied under the same leather-patch-elbowed radical professors be taken seriously? On the other hand, those of us that earned BS degrees from land-grant universities in fly-over country have much the same lack of respect for the coastal French Art History crowd. They are ignorant of basic scientific principles, economics, mathematics and other hard subjects that make up the knowledge base that makes the free world work. This election may be the real showdown between the producers and the non-producers in our society.”
From my clingy-small-town-in-the-Backcountry perspective, here is the bottom line: This is our country; we want one of us in each of the two top slots in the Federal government; and this election year, that means we vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin.
LINKS:
37.2 Million Watch Sarah Palin Accept Her Party’s Nomination
Sarah Palin – - Obama’s Worst Nightmare
Oinkin’ From The Boinkin’: Sexist Pig Of The Day Award, September 4
Oinkin’ from the Boinkin’: Sexist Pig Of The Day Award, Sept. 3
Lions, and Tigers, and . . . SEXIST PIGS! Oh, My!


September 4, 2008 at 11:25 pm
Wonderfully stated – never knew any of this before. Many thanks!
McCain-Palin ‘08 YES WE WILL!
September 5, 2008 at 12:57 am
That was a good article, amazes me everyday the things I have no clue about, but it makes perfect sense.
Country before party!!
September 5, 2008 at 1:08 am
Way to go Jay! I didn’t know the Ivey League connection was so clear and abundant. I can’t wait until the day in January when John McCain and Sarah Palin take office. But they will have a very hard row to hoe with a Dem majority in both houses and the Ivey league running Pravd… I mean the MSM.
John McCain’s acceptance speech was the most inspiring I have ever heard. From his heart to ours! But the Iveys don’t understand a man who loves his country. They are probably sniggering about it right now.
September 5, 2008 at 1:37 am
yes Jay you see the light. That Keith Overbite is the meanest thing on tv,he is very evil and scary I try to avoid that show,he looks like lucifer. I will try and keep up reading your articles
Mesa, Az
September 5, 2008 at 2:00 am
McCain and Palin have no love for country. Our country is in trouble economically. HOw is it that the two republicans say they are conservative reformist and yet they rack up tons of debt ( Mccain – Iraq; Palin – her town and state of Alaska). Meanwhile the ones who talk about solutions to social problems ( Democrats) have records that show fiscal conservatism time and time again?
This is the end of the Reagan Era and MCCain has brought it to an end with a big fat L on his forehead.
They can have all the guns and babies they want. What about the mortgage crisis? OH yeah that’s right, McCain thinks the economy is strong and says he never really understood it. ANd Palin says she never heard of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
I highly doubt this is representative of small town america. I am from a small rural area and we all know the economy is failing. NO need to have an ivy league degree to figure that out. But if that is what it takes to get something working – then please bring on the ivy leaguers because clearly mccain and bush (small town usa) aren’t going to be able to save our country.
oh yeah that’s right, now we are just borrowing money from china? so that we can keep fighting in Iraq. Even though there aren’t terrorists there?
that’s a great idea too.
remind me again. where are the real republicans?
September 5, 2008 at 9:03 am
As a westerner, schooled in one of those no-count western state universities I’ve been espousing this philosophy for years. The EE is showing its true bias now for all the world to see as not one, but two, (gasp!) candidates head up a national ticket and nether is an Ivy League schooled lawyer nor did they attend universities sanctioned by the EE -therefore they must be destroyed-. Immediately.
And, destroy them, they will.
September 5, 2008 at 9:17 am
Sorry, no offense intended. My verbiage must be too strong. What I meant is the powers that be, the EE, use the tools at hand, in this case the MSM, to make sure those who have not followed their path should not, likely will not, be advanced to the top echelons of the game politic.
It’s too early way out west here and my brain isn’t self monitoring, yet. Again, apologies if I’ve offended.
September 5, 2008 at 9:27 am
Nicely said. Whoever said, “You can always tell a Harvard man, but you can’t tell him much,” was dead on the money.
I am tired of them.
September 5, 2008 at 11:04 am
Way to lay it on the line! I also read some scathing commentary on Alaska and their rates of college attendance. They, then, bothered to point out that it was cultural and not the fault of the government. As an educator myself and the mother of two children 20+ who just went the college route, I can attest to the “racket” that college is today. It now takes 5 years to get a degree that used to take 4 (at 10x the cost). Then students are told that their bachelor’s degree is really worthless and they need a master’s or doctorate degree. The university has absolutely no vested interest or desire to help that student find a job. Their goal is to keep that student in college, feeding THEIR system. In our increasingly technological society, we are better off sending our children to tech schools so they can find real jobs with real futures. Look at where projected jobs are being discussed—in the energy sectors. Somebody will need to develop and service the technologies utilized. The only purpose I see to the “ivy-league” schools is to continue to separate the “elite” from the rest of America.
September 5, 2008 at 9:31 pm
JP:
To place the mortgage crisis at the feet of Republicans is unjust considering that the entire problem stems from the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, signed by President Carter. The Act was later made more oppressive on banks by President Clinton.
September 5, 2008 at 11:07 pm
Am I the only one who sees the irony of Republicans castigating the “Establishment Elite”?
September 6, 2008 at 12:01 am
Good writing, and good message. Overall, though, I don’t care if the P or the VP is an orange baboon, as long as they represent a conservative small government with low taxes. There’s too much focus on personality. But, I can’t vote–guess what, I’m Canadian–but I can tell you that I’ve lived in this socialist country ALL my life, and this fictional utopia the left is chasing is a big hoax. I refuse to believe that the American people will fall for it, no matter who is who’s running mate. It’s so simple, all one has to do at the end of the day is ask themselves if they want to pay more taxes. Everything starts and ends there. I hope that simple, simple concept doesn’t escape the masses on voting day, because if you become totally left, that will push us further left, and oh my… The ridiculous government run medical monopoly that the left aspires to doesn’t work. Until they’ve lived it a near-communist environment for 40 years like I have, they don’t have the knowledge or experience to say otherwise. I don’t know anyone who has received complete or proper medical care – EVER. At least in the US you get what you pay for – that’s fair. But, I guess you can’t control people with “fair”.
September 6, 2008 at 1:56 am
This world is complicated. Barack Obama and George W Bush are both EE’s. I have to think about that one.
September 6, 2008 at 11:59 am
[...] Sarah Palin versus The Establishment Elite [...]
September 6, 2008 at 6:16 pm
Hillary went to Yale Law School, not Harvard.
September 6, 2008 at 6:21 pm
Nate: You are right; correction made.
September 7, 2008 at 11:28 pm
[...] Sarah Palin versus The Establishment Elite Related Posts Sarah Palin Gives McCain “Troop” Surge in Enthusiasm, Fundraising [...]
September 12, 2008 at 3:15 am
[...] Sarah Palin versus The Establishment Elite [...]
September 13, 2008 at 11:02 am
[...] Sarah Palin versus The Establishment Elite [...]
September 13, 2008 at 5:06 pm
[...] Sarah Palin versus The Establishment Elite [...]
September 20, 2008 at 7:45 am
With the left out in left field and being shocked to see McCain and Palin slinging so much bull, Bob Barr is the one we need.